Många är arga för att
politiker förnekar att chemtrails existerar
och för att "journalister håller tyst".
Det har blivit något, som mest liknar
När himlen är rutig
så borde ju alla kunna se det
och inte bara somliga.
Men om engelska underhuset öppet diskuterar hur man ska lagstifta om detta så kan man väl inte säga att det är så väldigt hemligt? (Möjligen kan innehållet i sprayen vara hemlig p.g.a. militärens intressen).
Kan det månne vara så att det bara är ordvalet det hänger på?
De diskuterar ”geoengineering” och där ingår begreppet ”solar reflection” och "solar radiation management".
”Techniques in this category include the injection of sulphate aerosols
into the stratosphere to mimic the cooling effect caused by large volcanic eruptions.”
Men inte bara sulphate:
”The technologies and techniques vary so much that any regulatory framework for geoengineering cannot be uniform.” ”...new regulatory arrangements will have to be developed.” ”geoengineering testing is already underway. ”
”Geoengineering techniques should be graded with consideration to factors such as trans-boundary effect, the dispersal of potentially hazardous materials in the environment and the direct effect on ecosystems. The regulatory regimes for geoengineering should then be tailored accordingly.
The controls should be based on a set of principles that command widespread agreement—for example, the disclosure of geoengineering research and open publication of results and the development of governance arrangements before the deployment of geoengineering techniques.”
Solar Radiation Management (SRM)
The second category of climate geoengineering methods aims to offset greenhousewarming by reducing the incidence and absorption of incoming solar (short-wave)
radiation.
Proposals in this category include space-based shades or mirrors to block a portion of incoming solar radiation; and ways of increasing the Earth’s albedo (that is, its surface reflectivity of the sun’s radiation) by increasing cloud cover, whitening clouds or placing reflective particles or balloons into the stratosphere.
Och samarbete med USA:
”...during our visit to the USA in April 2009 we met the Chairman of the House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee, Representative Bart Gordon, who suggested that the committees might find it beneficial to coordinate their scrutiny on a subject. Later in the year we agreed that geoengineering was an area where we could pool our efforts and complement each other’s work,...”
Vad menar de med ”geoengineering”?
”... we use the term “geoengineering” to describe activities specifically and deliberately designed to effect a change in the global climate...”
A more succinct definition was provided by one of the witnesses to the current inquiry, Professor Keith: the intentional large-scale manipulation of the environment.
”We... took the view that technologies to reduce solar insolation
and to sequester carbon should both be considered as geoengineering.”
”Before deploying any technology with the capacity to geo-engineer the climate, we considered that it was essential that a rational debate on the ethics of geoengineering was conducted. We urged the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) to lead this debate, and to consult on the full range of geoengineering options.”
Hela texten finns här: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/221.pdf
Detta publicerades 2010 – vad har de sedan kommit fram till?
Det har gått fyra år. Har vi fått några lagar och förordningar?
Och vad säger svenska politiker? Tydligen ingenting.
