söndag 16 december 2018

Little manipulated Greta in Sweden

The little girl Greta has become famous because of her protest against our "doing nothing against the climate" and her call for immediate action on climate change. (Whatever that would be?) But this is not just her own idea - she is part of a big propaganda machine for promoting a book that her mother has written. The journalist Andreas Henriksson has also discovered an apparent manipulation of a facebook account to create a picture of big support.
But that is "almost nothing" compared to the big interests that are behind this movement that was created a long time ago.

You can start here with a short, easy and clear mindmap of those events.
The film is in Swedish!

PR-maskinen bakom Greta


Articles in Swedish:
Greta Thunbergs rekordsnabba aktivistkarriär. 
The text is in Swedish, but there is a button for translating it into other languages and most of the links lead to articles written in English.
PR-spinnet bakom Greta Thunberg        
Aftonbladet 
Dagens Nyheter 

This little girl (they say she´s 15 years old, but she looks like  only 10-11 years old) is just presenting some good sounding, popular words and the impression is that she is just being used by her parents and put forward by clever PR-tricks.

Possible that her concern about earth is a reaction from having been informed about climate change at school, but she is not and her teachers are not climate experts. They are just following the main stream agenda that has been set by the politicians (remember Al Gore.) They only repeat the most popular view that everyone is pumped up with. It is easy to hear on Greta that she is just a little sheep in the big flock.

Maybe they wanted to make a follow up of the emotionally so touching 12 year old Severn Cullis-Suzuki, The Girl Who Silenced the World for 5 Minutes.     More about her.




To understand how climate works is not easy, not even the scientists know all about it and humans can not do anything to change such big cycles. But politicians can always create and use a fear that they pump up people with. They need to have a big enemy as an excuse for a huge industry that is created to combat this enemy.

Around 1975 the fear of a new ice age was on the front pages. That was at least more logical as we know that it will come, sooner or later. An ice age is also more dangerous for us so there is a reason to be afraid.


That this PR behind Greta works well and gets response in media is not because it is aimed at the politicians as she claims. She wants "immediate action" and that is exactly what the politicians also want because they can use this concept for raising the gasoline prices and forcing all people to buy new electric cars. They can do anything and if they just call it "immediate action" and claim that "this is what the children of the world are calling for and it is our duty to...." then nobody dares to protest. "A call for immediate action" can also be used to force people to allow new, huge windmills everywhere, which is the start of a never-ending killing of the forests. Politicians call it "green energy" and people believe it.

Little Greta does not know that she indirectly is sponsoring another huge industry that is really killing the nature, animals, and insects. The windmills. Not to talk about the production of billions of new electric cars. All the big industries are far more dangerous than some warming. If the earth is dangerously sensitive to a warmer climate (which it has not been before) it is because we have destroyed almost all the forests on earth, so there is almost no nature left to absorb CO2. Huge industries are killing nature and animals in so many different ways. It is not because of the climate that all the insects are soon to be killed. The food producers all over the world are constantly spraying the fields with poison, with insecticides. And that is probably much more dangerous - to whole nature including humans.
A warmer climate is not dangerous to nature. It is not dangerous to people who live in the forests. It is only dangerous to those who live in the big cities, made by concrete and black asphalt, where the temperature can get very high also now on hot days. People in a huge city cannot stand more heat in summer. If we had been living a relatively natural life in natural forests, then we would not have had to get afraid of any global warming.
A warmer climate had only meant that we got more food. In a natural forestial landscape, there are creeks, lakes, and rivers. If we now are afraid this fear is an effect of the actions that we have made against the whole nature, which we have almost killed in all possible ways. 
It is not just about the climate. We are created to live in nature and not in big cities.


"Global Warming" is by many experts called a hoax. They say that the effect of CO2 is blown up too much by politicians to support their interests in power and money. They say that climate computer models do not match reality, because they are not programmed with the right information. "Global warming" got changed to "Climate Change" when it was not getting warmer and also because it is not possible to deny that our climate is changing (as it always is).

If you look at climate diagrams you can see that the rise and fall of the solar spots coincide with the rise and fall of temperature on earth. Many scientists (the older ones that are no longer afraid of losing the job) say that as we cannot foresee the sun activity we can also not know in advance how the global temperature will behave. The 11-year sunspot cycle is not the only cycle. There are bigger ones and we do not know exactly when the next ice age will come.

But something about it we can know from the Milankovitch Cycles. 
Earth is not always at the same distance from the sun.

Temperature is always going up and down
and it is not exceptionally warm now.
Look at the statistics that cover millions of years (at least look at thousands of years) and not just 200 years!
Around 1600 we hade the Little Ice Age and after that cold period, the temperature has been rising. Of course! The best would be to come back to the warm period of the early Middle Ages when we had a high culture with a thriving nature and lots of foods.

Climate Change after the last big ice age.







Imagine that you check the temperature every hour during the early morning.
Then you also get a curve that goes up every hour and if you don´t know that soon the cold night will also come.... if you don´t know that, there will be a reason for panic. 
 
Ups and downs in temperature during days and nights are as normal as ups and downs in temperature over centuries and thousands and millions of years. There is nothing that our politicians can do about these big swings.
The temperature was rising also before our industrial revolution. It has been rising many times in Earth´s history.

The real danger would be if climate headed towards a new cold period (an ice age) because if our northern countries got covered with ice we would not be able to be here. We would have to move to Africa. An ice age is something that happens every now and then and it will happen again. 

The killing of nature is, on the contrary, something that they would be able to do something about. If they wanted to. It would be better to stop the production of electric cars and instead of that concentrate on making "clean motors" with the capacity of a high reduction of the exhaust emissions. These cars could use algae as fuel, the greenest fuel that exists as the cultivation is a natural solar power.

Something is wrong, everyone seems to understand that, but to see what is really wrong is too difficult. This feeling creates fear and anger and the politicians (or the power behind the scene, the big bankers ) use this to manipulate people in desired directions, which is at present to create a worldwide use of electric cars and windmills. The mills destroy life in the countryside as people cannot live near them.

Do not believe the propaganda of the elite! 

The Elite that controls the money is the problem and they control our politicians and big information channels and also professors at high schools. Who they are and what they do is not printed in our newspapers or being reported in the TV-news. It is to be found on the internet, but there is so much info from all sides, both true and fake, so it is difficult to know what is what.

These powerful people (oligarchs) are quite intelligent and so far they have controlled mainstream opinion. But their propaganda block begins to crack down because of all the free channels that the Internet has provided us with.

An oligarch is a member of an oligarchy, a power structure where control resides in a small number of people.
Bilderberg Group  Secret meetings with politicians.

New World Order It is not surprising that NWO is seen as a conspiration.

Trilateral Commission The Trilateral Commission is a non-governmental, nonpartisan discussion group founded by David Rockefeller in July 1973 to foster closer cooperation among Japan, Western Europe, and North America.
Critics accuse the Commission of promoting a global consensus among the international ruling classes in order to manage international affairs in the interest of the financial and industrial elites under the Trilateral umbrella.
In his 1980 book With No Apologies, Republican Senator Barry Goldwater suggested the discussion group was "a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical... [in] the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved

Now they want to force people all over the world to junk the old cars and to replace them with electric cars. An enormously huge industrial complex (also producing big junkyards) that forces people to buy new things. Of course, that is good for the Western and American industries but it can hardly be "saving the planet". They call it "green" but it is probably just greenwashing.

They want to build windmills in nature, in the mountains, in the forests! The mills kill the big birds, They kill the bats (the variations in air-pressure make their lungs implode). The big wings spread bisphenol A with the wind and poison the ground and the waters. 

The only green thing would be to let nature live!

Stop taking down the forests for profit. Let the wild animals have their space! A living nature with all the animals, plants and microbes form the metabolism of the planet. This whole ecosystem is producing the oxygen that we need for living. Algae also consume CO2 (if that makes people happy.)

What we are doing to the metabolism of Earth is then also happening in our own metabolism and it creates cancer and auto-immune diseases, which we will not be able to handle when nature has died. Mono-cultures that are being genetically modified and sprayed with glyphosate will not solve the problem of all our diseases. It will just make the situation worse and the pharmaceutical industry richer. This business is also controlled by the ruling bankers.

The absolutely most green method to produce energy is to grow algae.

If anything is green the algae are! They can be cultivated everywhere, in big pools and in small pet bottles. These algae can be used for both food and car fuel. Such a culture consumes CO2, gives us oil for fuel, "gasoline" for the cars and also protein-rich food. This is a copy of nature´s own method of producing energy from the solar rays. It is green solar energy! Natures own solar cells.
The algae that are being sold as healthy food are called Spirulina.





Read more about Climate Change and the mainstream view.








lördag 15 december 2018

Cancer and angiogenesis

The cancer cells are growing because they have a support of nutrition, they have a blood support and without these blood vessels they will not live. The forming of new blood vessels does not occur in a healthy grown up person unless there is a special cause for it, as for example menstruation,  childbirth or a wound.  The body can produce stimulators to blood vessel growth when it is necessary, and also inhibitors. This growth is called angiogenesis and when it gets out of balance it is associated with at least 70 major diseases that billions of people have today.

Science is of course interested in finding a method to inhibit this abnormal angiogenesis. The idea is to create a pill that blocks abnormal angiogenesis. Such an antiangiogenesis, an inhibitor, would deprive the cancer cells of the oxygen and the nutrients and they would die.

Most grown up people have small cancer cells (0,5 mm) in the body, but because of lack of nutrition these cells never grow big and they do not get dangerous. Our angiogenesis inhibitors defend us so these cancer cells that we have are harmless until the angiogenesis is turned on and they get blood supply.

Cancer and inflammatory diseases are linked to this extra blood flow. Inflammation and angiogenesis are two separate things, but they seem to stimulate each other. In inflammation, the balance is clearly tipped in favor of angiogenesis. Read more...

We have often heard that antioxidants in berries, fruits and vegetables are "anti-inflammatory" but here we can now ad a new concept. The same food seems to be listed also among the anti-angiogenesis. 

We now also know that vegetable oils, that we consume so much of (because they have fooled us into believeing that they are healthy), are inflammatory! Grains can also be listed here as they contain much omega-6-fat. We can take oils from grains and seeds.

Imagine that you are in an old healthy forest 20.000 years ago and you go out and search for food! Do you think that you would eat the grains from the grasses??? No! You would do the most easy thing - you would eat greens and fruits and then you would go down to the lake and get a fish (or a frog). Humans have no evolutionary basis for eating grass. Seeds are difficult to eat and raw beans are usually poisonous (five raw kidney beans can kill a person).

The two phenomena, angiogenesis and inflammation, have long been coupled together in many chronic inflammatory disorders with distinct etiopathogenic origin, including psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, diabetes, and cancer.
Inflammation and angiogenesis can be triggered by the same molecular events and a treatment has to target both of them.

"Most current therapeutic strategies intended to stop the progress of the tumor vascularization are at a preclinical stage, and only a handful of these strategies are emerging as clinical reality." ScienceDirect

In this video we can see a list of medicines together with a list of natural foods. There are natural greens, herbs and fruits that have the same effect as the future miracle pill. Just start eating them!

And avoid junk food  I would guess that most of our "normal food" thay we see in the shop contain angiogenic growth factors. I already know that much of it is "inflammatory".




Dr Gundry speaks about the good and the bad gut bacteria and how these little things can send signals to other parts of the body to get what they want. I think that it must be highly likely that there are some bacteria that are allies with the cancer cells and help them get the desired blood vessels. Why not? The gut bacteria is of main concern in many videos.

The stories about antioxidants, inflammations, cancer, angiogenesis and gut bacteria sound as if they would just be the same story, seen from different angles.


When angiogenesis is “turned on”, and the cancer cells are fed by sufficient blood vessels, tumours can develop. Antiangiogenic therapy aims to starve the cancer of its blood supply, thus rendering the isolated cancer cells harmless.  Read more... 
Here is also a list with food that have antiangiogenic properties.... oranges, blueberries....

Previous article here.
Cancer, the gold mine of the pharmaceutical industry

More about inflammations (in Swedish).
Allergier, huvudvärk, migrän, astma, artrit, smärtor i kroppen...?


According to Dr Axe 
there is resveratrol also in blueberries,

fredag 14 december 2018

Cancer, the gold mine of the pharmaceutical industry

When I was a kid not many people had cancer (maybe 5%), but today it is every third person (33%).  Why has it increased so much? Is it maybe because all our junk food, sugar, toxic chemicals, microwaves, gmo, stress, pollution and pesticides??? 

What the doctor does to it is surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.
This cancer industry is a huge international business that actively defends it´s position against any kind of natural treatment. Such treatments with diet and herbs have all been declared illegal, i.e. a doctor is not allowed to have a cancer clinic that uses natural methods.

The manager of a multi billion dollar industry has the obligation towards the shareholders to maximise the profit. So such a company is dependent on the sick patients, and this situation takes away any interest in really making sick people healthy again. So they have declared war against the helth practitioners who use natural methods which make people healthy.

That is the background for the book Dödliga mediciner och organiserad brottslighet  (Deadly medicines and organized crime) by professor Peter Gøtzsche,  who accuses the pharmaceutical industry of criminal methods to maximize their profit. He poses the question of how it can be possible that we allow them to lie so much and also to commit repeated crimes causing the death of people. Medical drugs is the third biggest cause of death among americans.

Over one million new cancer diagnoses are made every year in the US and every patient has to spend 50.000 USD on the treatment. But as they have not been treating the cause of the cancer it comes back and usually 2/3 of the treated patients die within five years.

It is a sad story that they also use this method for children, who are in the same time allowed to eat cancerogenic junk food (as these doctors know nothing about healthy food). The companies that "own" the medical schools are not interested in "healthy living"and "holistic methods" and other such annoying things that could eventually ruin their business.

Once upon a time the bankers took over the medical schools by funding them, which gave them the right to control them, and then other kinds of methods were made illegal. Medicine was now intended for business and not for helping people get healthy. "Alternative doctors" who were able to cure cancer had to go to jail for it. It became a crime to cure people with the wrong method.

There are scores of alternative cancer clinics all over the world claiming high success rate, yet most of these treatments have been banned in the US or been driven out of the country, without any investigation. I think it is the same in Sweden.

A famous example is Harry M. Hoxsey who expanded to 17 states by the mid 1950s, constantly battling organized medicine that labeled him a charlatan. He was successfully treating his cancer patients, but all his clinics were closed as they were declared illegal.
His treatment consists of a caustic herbal paste for external cancers or an herbal mixture for "internal" cancers, combined with laxatives, douches, vitamin supplements, and dietary changes.

Those who had the money also took over the propaganda machine, telling mainstream that herbal medicine is just a fake.
97% of the chemotherapy does not work. So why is it used? There is one reason only and that is money! If your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, he buys it from the pharmaceutical company and then he sells it to you for a much higher price, putting a lot of money in his own pocket. This is the only kind of prescription that he can make money from in this way.
Most people do not know that the pharmaceutical industry has this kind of control över us!

Chemotherapy and radiation help only 3% of the patients! It takes away the tumour, but the cancer stem cells, which are 1% of the tumour, they are not affected by this therapy. They remain and they just get more resistent and more agressive, so when they start growing again the mortality rate rises drastically.  From 1950 to 2005 the rate of death in cancer decreased with only 5 %, which shows that there is not much advancement in this area.



So... what to do?


And more?

And don´t hold the mobile phone close to the head! I have read somewhere that brain tumour among children has increased much after the introduction of mobile phones! Avoid using wireless equipment at home, especially if you have children, as it can cause other problems also.
Almost 11,000 people are diagnosed each year with a primary brain tumour, including 500 children and young people – that's 30 people every day. I would like to find the statistics för the last 50 years, but I can´t find it. 

And also....talking about that.....it´s not only cancer....don´t let the small girls hold a wireless tablet close to the body. According to Barrie Trower, a former microwave weapons expert, it can affect the eggs in the ovary and when so it can cause hereditary damage to the dna (the damage will be inherited in all coming generations).


Wifi, Microwaves and the Consequences to our Health

Try to avoid everything that contains toxic chemicals.


And watch this before giving money to cancer research.
Läkaren dr Véronique Desaulniers varnar för Rosa bandetkampanjen som syftar till att samla in pengar till cancerforskning. Hon menar att kampanjen inte har åstadkommit något vettigt för att minska cancerriskerna. Istället går endast pengarna till läkemedelsindustrin och till ännu mer riskabel kemoterapi.




onsdag 12 december 2018

Vilken bil är bäst?

Argument mot elbilen

först från Aftonbladets trafikreporter Robert Collin, Nyhetsmorgon TV4.

Andrahandsvärdet = 0
En elbil kommer inte att ha något andrahandsvärde eftersom ingen vill köpa en begagnad elbil, som har en omodern teknologi.

Produktionen > CO2
Om man också räknar med produktionen av elbilen + batterierna + elen så skapar den lika mycket CO2 som de vanliga bensinbilarna.

Motorstopp i den stora skogen
Du kan inte köra den ute på landet för där finns inga laddstolpar överallt. Du kommer bara 15 mil och sedan motorstopp.

Enligt en rapport från Svenska Miljöinstitutet så blir det 15-20 ton CO2-utsläpp av att tillverka ett batteri (det största batteriet). Det motsvarar att man kör några varv runt jorden med en gammal dieselbil.

Ökad el.produktion krävs.
Elbilarna måste laddas. I stora delar av världen produceras denna el. i kolkraftverk, som avger stora mängder CO2.

I Sverige bygger man ut vindkraften för att få mer energi, ofta även i skogen på något berg.
Vinden är förnybar, men dessa 250 meter höga torn är inte förnybara. De förstör skogen där de sätts upp och efter 15-20 år måste de skrotas. Människor kan inte heller bo i närheten av snurrorna eftersom man kan blir sjuk av ultraljuden.
Skogen och djuren blir också förgiftade av att vingarna avger bisfenol A, som är hormonstörande och skadligt för vattenlevande organismer.

Ett batteri håller inte i evighet.
Det måste bytas ut efter några år. Hur länge håller dina bilbatterier? Elbilar kommer med 5-8 års batterigarantier. En Nissan Leaf taxi som körts 16 000 mil i England har tappat 12,5 procent av sin batterikapacitet.
Det tycks betyda att den som köper en "normal begagnad bil" måste köpa nya batterier.

Och vad kostar det att köpa nya? När, var och hur ska de skrotas? Vilka miljöproblem kommer detta att skapa när hundratals miljarder batterier ska skrotas?

En el.bil ska laddas hemma varje natt. Då blir batteriet aldrig helt urladdat. Ett helt urladdat batteri tar lång tid att ladda upp! En total urladdning (motorstopp på vägen i skogen) ger en permanent skada på batteriet.
Batterier tål inte kyla, så på natten värms batteriet av laddaren (strömmen från laddstolpen). Att elbilen fungerar bra tycks kräva att man är hemma vid laddstolpen.
Citat:
"Moderna elbilar har värmeisolerade batterier som värms med värmeelement på vintern. Medan bilen laddas på natten värms batterierna med el från elnätet. Under färd värms batterierna med el från batteripacket självt."
Men vad händer när bilen är parkerad var som helst på vintern? Om du är på besök i ett annat samhälle så kanske det inte finns någon ledig el-parkering där.

Vad händer om du skulle vilja åka till kusinen i Skogby, som ligger 8 mil från närmaste el.stolpe, och du skulle vilja stanna en vecka för att åka skidor och det är -25C?
Bilens batterier kommer att använda sin laddning till att hålla sig varma dygnet runt och.... hur lång tid tar det då för batterierna att bli helt urladdade?
Det låter som att det finns en risk att du inte kan komma därifrån utan att ringa Vägassistans och batterierna kan också ha blivit förstörda av urladdningen och kylan. Mer om batterier.

Den grönaste metoden = odla bensin i avloppsvatten
Ett bättre miljöalternativ skulle vara att göra olja av alger. En algodling "slukar" CO2, eftersom alger och växter "äter" CO2. Alger är också bra mat, mkt proteiner. Nyttigt! Alla kan odla alger överallt.
Alger är alltså så lätt att skapa att de stora bolagen inte kan ta monopol på det.
Algodling är något så grönt och naturligt att man inte kan använda det för att ta kontroll över folk och därför är politikerna och storbankerna inte intresserade.

För att odla alger krävs bara att man har en behållare med vatten. Det går bra med både en stor bassäng och en petflaska. Man kan använda avloppsvatten till att odla dem för att sedan utvinna olja, som man gör bensin av.
Algodling innebär att man kopierar jordens egen metod att förvandla solljus till olja och proteiner.
Odlade alger, som man köper i hälsokostaffärer, heter Spirulina.Data visar att en hektar algodling ger lika mycket avkastning som fem hektar raps. Dessutom sker algodlingen på obrukbar mark. Läs mer om alger